Türk Medline
Dokran

PERSPECTIVES ON THE USE OF DIGITAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES IN CARDIOLOGY AMONG SPECIALISTS FROM AN ESC MEMBER COUNTRY: RESULTS FROM A SURVEY

DUYGU KOÇYİGİT BURUNKAYA, NURGÜL KESER, EVRİM ŞİMŞEK, SERDAR BOZYEL, YALÇIN DALGIÇ, MEHMET ŞEKER, YETKİN KORKMAZ, ARDA GÜLER, TUFAN ÇINAR, MEHMET ERTÜRK

Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology - 2024;52(1):44-51

Guven Health Group, Ankara, Türkiye

 

OBJECTIVE In this study, we aimed to identify the reasons for and perceived challenges associated with the use of digital health technologies (DHT) in cardiology. METHOD We distributed an online survey to Turkish Society of Cardiology member cardiologists (n = 2789) between January 10 and March 3, 2022. RESULTS A total of 308 subjects responded (27.6% females, 62.0% aged 30-44 years). Of these, 42.5% worked at university hospitals, and 44.8% at state hospitals. Smart devices were used by 44.2% (136/308) for personal health monitoring. Additionally, 40.3% (117/290) used social media to provide medical information to patients, while 64.6% (193/299) did so for communication with other physicians. The self-reported recommendation frequencies of wearables, cardiac implantable electronic device telemonitorization, mobile health applications, and teleconsultation/televisit technologies were lower than the proportion of respondents who found DHT beneficial for both patients and physicians. The most frequently mentioned barriers for physicians were increased work burden and responsibilities (78.8%, 193/245), lack of financial compensation (66.9%, 164/245), and lack of relevant training (66.5%, 163/245). For patients, low technological adaptability (81.6%, 200/245), low health literacy (80.4%, 197/245), and low affordability (79.6%, 195/245) were the most frequently mentioned barriers. Additionally, the cost of technologies (69.4%, 170/245), concerns regarding data privacy and security (57.6%, 141/245), and data storage challenges (48.2%, 118/245) were the most significant technical impediments. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that although the majority of physicians believe DHT to be beneficial for both themselves and their patients, the frequency of recommendations to patients remains low. A large-scale joint effort is required to address these issues and facilitate the integration of DHT into clinical practice.